Directional vs Non-Directional Wind Loads

Overview of Directional Wind Loads

The ASCE 7-16 standard includes comprehensive wind speed maps (Figures 26.5-1A through 26.5-1C) that provide basic design wind speeds for use in structural calculations throughout the United States and its territories. These maps are fundamental to determining wind loads for buildings and structures per the 2018 and 2021 International Building Code (IBC).

The wind speeds shown on ASCE 7-16 maps are 3-second gust speeds at 33 feet (10 meters) above ground in Exposure C (open terrain), based on Risk Category II buildings (standard occupancy). These values represent the basis for all wind load calculations and must be adjusted using the appropriate importance factors for Risk Categories I, III, and IV.

Reference Height

All wind speeds are referenced at 33 feet (10 meters) above ground level. Actual pressure calculations account for height effects using velocity pressure exposure coefficients (Kh or Kz).

3-Second Gust

Wind speeds represent the fastest 3-second average wind speed, which corresponds to peak gust effects on structures. This differs from 1-minute or hourly average wind speeds.

Exposure C Basis

Maps assume Exposure C terrain (open terrain with scattered obstructions). Sites with Exposure B, D, or transition zones require adjustments via velocity pressure coefficients.

Risk Category II

Basic wind speeds are for Risk Category II structures (standard occupancy). Use importance factors I_w to adjust for Risk Categories I (0.87), III (1.15), or IV (1.15).

ASCE 7 provides two approaches for calculating wind loads: the Directional Procedure (with K_d = 0.85) and the Non-Directional Procedure (with K_d = 1.0). Understanding when to use each method is critical for code compliance and economic design.

Key Difference

Directional Procedure (K_d = 0.85): Accounts for the low probability that maximum wind speed and most critical wind direction occur simultaneously. Reduces design wind pressures by 15%.

Non-Directional Procedure (K_d = 1.0): Conservative approach that assumes worst-case wind can come from any direction. Uses full wind speed without directional reduction.

The directional procedure is the standard approach for most buildings (ASCE 7 Chapters 27-30). The non-directional procedure is reserved for special structures where directional effects cannot be reliably determined.

Wind Directionality Factor (K_d)

The wind directionality factor K_d accounts for two reduced-probability scenarios:

Direction Probability

The probability that the maximum wind speed occurs from the exact direction that produces maximum structural response is low.

Multi-Directional Response

Wind from different directions produces different load patterns. Peak loads from all directions rarely occur simultaneously.

Statistical Basis

K_d = 0.85 is derived from wind tunnel data and meteorological analysis showing 15% reduction is statistically justified.

Calibration

The 0.85 factor is calibrated with historical performance data to maintain consistent reliability for building structures.

K_d Values by Structure Type

Structure Type	K_d Factor	Rationale
Buildings (ASCE 7 Ch. 27-30)	0.85	Standard directional procedure applies
Arched roofs	0.85	Directional effects present
Chimneys, tanks, similar structures	0.85	Round/square → directional effects
Solid freestanding walls/signs	0.85	Wind perpendicular to surface governs
Open signs and lattice frameworks	0.85	Directional pressure coefficients used
Trussed towers (triangular, square)	0.85	Directional force coefficients
Trussed towers (all other)	1.00	Non-directional - conservative

Velocity Pressure Equation with K_d:

q_h = 0.00256 K_h K_zt K_d K_e V²

For most buildings: K_d = 0.85

This reduces velocity pressure by 15%, which translates to approximately 15% reduction in component wind loads and member design forces.

Calculation Example: Directional vs Non-Directional

Let's compare the two approaches for a commercial building window:

Structure

Office building - Charlotte, NC
Risk Category II
Enclosed building
Height: 30 ft

Wind Parameters

V = 115 mph (ASCE 7-22)
Exposure C
K_zt = 1.0 (flat)
K_e = 1.0

Component

Window - Zone 5
Effective area = 10 ft²
GC_p = -1.00
(corner/edge location)

Enclosure

Enclosed
GC_pi = ±0.18
(ASCE 7 Fig. 26.13-1)

Method 1: Directional Procedure (Standard - K_d = 0.85)

Step 1: Calculate K_h for Exposure C, h=30 ft:

K_h = 2.01(30/33)^(2/9.5) = 0.98

Step 2: Calculate velocity pressure with K_d = 0.85:

q_h = 0.00256 × 0.98 × 1.0 × 0.85 × 1.0 × 115²
q_h = 0.00256 × 0.98 × 0.85 × 13,225
q_h = 28.0 psf

Step 3: Calculate wind pressure (negative external, positive internal):

p = q_h[(GC_p) - (GC_pi)]
p = 28.0[(-1.00) - (+0.18)]
p = 28.0 × (-1.18)
p = -33.0 psf (suction)

Step 4: Component selection:

Required DP rating ≥ 33.0 psf
Select: DP-40 window (40 psf capacity for LRFD)
Or: DP-25 window (25/0.6 = 41.7 psf for ASD use)

Method 2: Non-Directional Procedure (K_d = 1.0)

Step 1: K_h same as above:

K_h = 0.98

Step 2: Calculate velocity pressure with K_d = 1.0:

q_h = 0.00256 × 0.98 × 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 × 115²
q_h = 0.00256 × 0.98 × 1.0 × 13,225
q_h = 33.2 psf

Step 3: Calculate wind pressure:

p = q_h[(GC_p) - (GC_pi)]
p = 33.2[(-1.00) - (+0.18)]
p = 33.2 × (-1.18)
p = -39.2 psf (suction)

Step 4: Component selection:

Required DP rating ≥ 39.2 psf
Select: DP-40 window (barely adequate)
Or: DP-30 window (30/0.6 = 50 psf for ASD - adequate)

Comparison Summary

Parameter	Directional (K_d=0.85)	Non-Directional (K_d=1.0)	Difference
K_d Factor	0.85	1.00	+18%
Velocity Pressure q_h	28.0 psf	33.2 psf	+19%
Design Pressure p	-33.0 psf	-39.2 psf	+19%
Component (LRFD)	DP-40	DP-40 (tight)	-
Component (ASD)	DP-25	DP-30	1 rating higher

Economic Impact: Using the directional procedure (K_d = 0.85) results in approximately 19% lower design pressures, allowing selection of lower-rated (less expensive) components while maintaining code compliance and structural safety.

When to Use Each Procedure

Use Directional (K_d=0.85)

✓ All buildings per ASCE 7 Chapters 27-30

✓ Arched roofs

✓ Chimneys, tanks, round/square structures

✓ Freestanding walls and signs

✓ Lattice frameworks

✓ Triangular/square trussed towers

✓ Any structure where directional pressure coefficients are provided

Use Non-Directional (K_d=1.0)

! Trussed towers (non-triangular, non-square)

! Structures with complex geometries where wind directionality cannot be determined

! Situations where the engineer chooses conservative approach

! Special structures not covered by standard ASCE 7 provisions

Note: This is rarely required for typical building design

Common Scenarios

Project Type	Procedure	K_d	Justification
Residential house	Directional	0.85	ASCE 7 Ch. 28 (envelope procedure)
Commercial office building	Directional	0.85	ASCE 7 Ch. 27 or 30 (components/MWFRS)
Metal building (pre-engineered)	Directional	0.85	ASCE 7 Ch. 27 (directional procedure)
Water tank (cylindrical)	Directional	0.85	ASCE 7 Ch. 29 (tanks, chimneys)
Freestanding billboard sign	Directional	0.85	ASCE 7 Ch. 29 (solid freestanding walls)
Triangular cell tower	Directional	0.85	ASCE 7 Ch. 29.4.2 (triangular towers)
Hexagonal cell tower	Non-Directional	1.00	ASCE 7 Ch. 29.4.2 (other cross-sections)

Common Mistakes with K_d

Mistake #1: Forgetting K_d Entirely

WRONG: Calculating wind loads without including K_d in velocity pressure equation

RIGHT: q_h = 0.00256 K_h K_zt K_d K_e V² (always include for buildings)

Impact: 18% over-design, unnecessary cost, conservative but wasteful

Mistake #2: Using K_d = 1.0 for Buildings

WRONG: "I'll be conservative and use K_d = 1.0 for this office building"

RIGHT: ASCE 7 requires K_d = 0.85 for buildings (Ch. 26-30). Using 1.0 is NOT more code-compliant, just wasteful.

Impact: Unnecessary over-design, higher material costs, no safety benefit

Mistake #3: Applying K_d to Wind Speed Instead of q_h

WRONG: V_design = 0.85 × 115 mph = 98 mph, then calculate q_h

RIGHT: K_d is applied IN the velocity pressure equation: q_h = 0.00256...K_d V²

Impact: Incorrect pressures (reduces by ~28% instead of 15%)

Mistake #4: Confusing K_d with Other Factors

WRONG: "K_d is the same as the wind directionality importance factor"

RIGHT: K_d is separate from importance factor (Risk Category), topographic factor K_zt, and exposure coefficient K_h

Impact: Conceptual errors, incorrect application of code provisions

Directional Procedure Checklist

Verify structure type qualifies for directional procedure (most buildings do)

Use K_d = 0.85 in velocity pressure equation

Apply K_d as multiplier in q_h calculation (NOT to wind speed)

Do NOT omit K_d - it's required by code for applicable structures

Document use of directional procedure in design calculations

Check ASCE 7 Table 26.13-1 for correct K_d value by structure type

If using non-directional procedure (K_d=1.0), document justification

Wind Loads with K_d = 0.85 Automatically Applied

WindLoadCalc.com applies the directional procedure (K_d = 0.85) automatically for building components

Try Wind LoadCalc FREE

✓ ASCE 7-16 & 7-22 compliant ✓ K_d = 0.85 applied automatically ✓ Component pressures & DP ratings ✓ Instant results

Directional Wind Loads

Quick Navigation: Design Methods

Overview of Directional Wind Loads

Reference Height

3-Second Gust

Exposure C Basis

Risk Category II