Modern strength-based approach to wind load design per ASCE 7
Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD), also called Strength Design, is a modern structural design methodology that uses probabilistic analysis to achieve consistent reliability across different failure modes and materials. For wind loads, LRFD uses a load factor of 1.0 applied to the wind load (W) in governing load combinations per ASCE 7 Section 2.3.
LRFD separates load factors (applied to loads) from resistance factors φ (applied to member strengths). The design philosophy is: Factored Load ≤ Factored Resistance, or more formally: ∑γiQi ≤ φRn, where γ represents load factors, Q represents loads, φ is the resistance factor, and Rn is nominal strength.
LRFD uses probability-based load and resistance factors to achieve target reliability index (β ≈ 3.0 for 50-year service life), providing consistent safety across structural systems.
Wind loads in LRFD are factored by 1.0 in governing strength combinations. The full calculated wind pressure is used without reduction, with safety on the resistance side via φ factors.
LRFD applies resistance factors φ to nominal strengths: φ = 0.90 (tension), 0.90 (flexure steel), 0.75 (compression), 0.65-0.90 (concrete flexure), accounting for uncertainty in material properties.
LRFD is the standard method for commercial steel and concrete construction, high-rise buildings, engineered wood structures, and Main Wind Force Resisting System (MWFRS) design.
| Load Combination | Formula | When It Governs |
|---|---|---|
| Combination 3 | 1.2D + 1.6(Lr or S or R) + (L or 0.5W) | Gravity-dominated structures where wind is secondary |
| Combination 4 | 1.2D + 1.0W + L + 0.5(Lr or S or R) | Most wind load cases - full wind with moderate gravity loads |
| Combination 5 | 1.2D + 1.0E + L + 0.2S | Seismic (not wind, but shown for completeness) |
| Combination 6 | 0.9D + 1.0W | Wind uplift - critical for lightweight structures, roofs, overhangs, and negative pressures |
Wind pressures for LRFD use the same ASCE 7 equations as ASD. The key difference is how these pressures are applied in load combinations - LRFD uses the full calculated pressure (1.0W) rather than a reduced value (0.6W), with safety addressed through resistance factors φ.
p = q Kz Kzt Kd Cp (leeward and windward walls)
Where:
| Material/Member Type | Resistance Factor (φ) | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Steel - Tension | φ = 0.90 | Yielding of gross section, fracture of net section (AISC 360) |
| Steel - Flexure | φ = 0.90 | Lateral-torsional buckling, local buckling, yielding |
| Steel - Compression | φ = 0.90 | Column buckling, local buckling (AISC 360-16) |
| Concrete - Flexure | φ = 0.65-0.90 | Depends on tension vs compression-controlled (ACI 318) |
| Concrete - Shear | φ = 0.75 | Shear and torsion in beams and slabs |
| Wood - All Limit States | φ = 0.85 | Bending, compression, tension, shear (NDS for Wood) |
LRFD applies the full wind load (1.0W) to the structure, then ensures safety by reducing the resistance side using φ factors:
This provides consistent reliability across all structural materials and failure modes.
Let's walk through a complete LRFD design example for a steel beam subjected to wind loads.
Office building
Risk Category II
Enclosed, h=40 feet
Houston, Texas
V = 130 mph
Exposure Category C
Flat terrain (Kzt = 1.0)
Elev < 3,000 ft
Steel roof beam W16×26
Span: 25 feet
Tributary width: 12 ft
Roof slope: 4:12 (18.4°)
LRFD per AISC 360-16
1.0W load factor
φ = 0.90 (flexure)
Strength design
qh = 0.00256 Kh Kzt Kd Ke V²
Kh = 0.85 (Table 26.10-1, Exposure C, h=40 ft)
Kzt = 1.0, Kd = 0.85, Ke = 1.0, V = 130 mph
qh = 0.00256 × 0.85 × 1.0 × 0.85 × 1.0 × (130)²
qh = 30.9 psf
For MWFRS, windward roof (18.4° slope):
Cp = -0.9 (suction, Figure 27.4-1)
GCpi = ±0.18
p = qh [(Cp) - (GCpi)]
p = 30.9 × [(-0.9) - (+0.18)]
p = -33.4 psf (net uplift)
Wind load W = -33.4 psf × 12 ft = -400.8 lb/ft
Dead load D = -25 psf × 12 ft = -300 lb/ft
LRFD Combination 6: 0.9D + 1.0W (uplift)
wu = 0.9(-300) + 1.0(-400.8)
wu = -671 lb/ft (factored uplift)
Required Strength:
Mu = wuL²/8 = 671 × (25)² / 8
Mu = 52.5 kip-ft
Design Strength (W16×26, AISC 360-16):
Mn = 118 kip-ft (nominal capacity)
φMn = 0.90 × 118
φMn = 106 kip-ft
Check: Mu ≤ φMn
52.5 kip-ft < 106 kip-ft ✓ OK
Utilization = 52.5/106 = 50%
1. Calculate Loads: Wind pressure p using ASCE 7 equations
2. Apply Load Factors: 1.2D + 1.0W (or 0.9D + 1.0W for uplift)
3. Determine Required Strength: Mu, Vu, Pu from structural analysis
4. Calculate Design Strength: φRn per material specifications
5. Verify: Required Strength ≤ Design Strength
LRFD is the modern standard for commercial construction, providing consistent reliability across materials and structural systems.
AISC 360 steel design specifications are primarily LRFD-based. Modern commercial steel structures, office buildings, and industrial facilities use LRFD as standard.
ACI 318 concrete code uses "Strength Design" (equivalent to LRFD). All modern concrete buildings use factored loads with φ reduction factors.
Tall buildings and complex structures exclusively use LRFD for consistent reliability analysis across all structural elements and load paths.
Main Wind Force Resisting Systems (lateral systems) typically designed using LRFD for frames, shear walls, and braced frames.
Modern engineered wood products (glulam, LVL, CLT) increasingly use LRFD per NDS, though ASD remains common for traditional lumber.
Many jurisdictions and design standards now require or strongly prefer LRFD for commercial construction due to probabilistic basis.
| Material | Design Standard | Primary Method | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steel | AISC 360-16 | LRFD | Industry standard since 1986 |
| Concrete | ACI 318-19 | Strength Design (LRFD) | Required - ASD not available |
| Wood | NDS 2018 | ASD/LRFD both | Transition ongoing, LRFD growing |
| Masonry | TMS 402/602 | Strength Design/ASD | Both methods available |
WRONG: Applying 1.0W LRFD loads directly to DP-rated components (DP ratings are ASD)
RIGHT: Convert LRFD loads to ASD equivalent by dividing by 1.6, OR verify component has LRFD-specific rating
WRONG: Only checking Combination 4 (1.2D + 1.0W) for all wind cases
RIGHT: ALWAYS check BOTH Combo 4 AND Combo 6. The 0.9D factor often governs for lightweight roofs and uplift
WRONG: Using ASCE 7 load factors with outdated material resistance factors from older codes
RIGHT: Ensure material code edition matches IBC/ASCE 7 edition for consistent reliability (e.g., ASCE 7-16 with AISC 360-16)
WRONG: Using φ = 0.90 for all steel members regardless of limit state
RIGHT: Select φ based on specific failure mode: 0.90 (flexure), 0.90 (tension), 0.90 (compression), 0.75 (shear/bearing)
Visit WindLoadCalc.com for automated LRFD wind load calculations, MWFRS and C&C analysis, and professional ASCE 7-22/7-16 software. Generate complete LRFD calculation reports with factored loads and resistance checks.
Calculate LRFD Wind Loads Now →Visit WindLoadCalc.com for automated ASCE 7-22 and 7-16 wind speed lookup, professional wind load calculator software, and the Building Intelligence Platform (BIP) for comprehensive structural analysis.
Visit WindLoadCalc.com →